Menu

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

3 neumáticos comparados 7 pruebas compartidas Verano
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Verano · Turismo Premium
Tyre Reviews9.3
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
4
Wins
0
Draws
3
Losses
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Verano · Turismo Premium
Tyre Reviews8.6
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
3
Wins
0
Draws
4
Losses
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Verano · Turismo Premium
Tyre Reviews8.1
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
0
Wins
0
Draws
7
Losses

Ajustar la ponderación de la categoría

Ajuste la importancia de cada categoría de desempeño para ver cómo las diferentes prioridades afectan la clasificación general en todas las pruebas compartidas.

Seco 35%
Húmedo 50%
Comodidad 5%
Valor 10%
Seco 35% · Húmedo 50% · Comodidad 5% · Valor 10%
Ajustar las subcategorías
Seco
Húmedo
Comodidad
Valor
RangoNeumáticoPuntajeSecoHúmedoComodidadValor
1Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 298.8%99.4%98.4%99.2%98.1%
2Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun98.1%100%99.9%97.3%82.8%
3Kleber Dynaxer HP496%99%95.3%99%87.2%

Desglose de categorías

Desgloses detallados

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Concrete [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Tyre Weight [Kg] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Fuel Consumption [l/100km] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)
Historial de victorias, empates y derrotas prueba por prueba
RangoNeumáticoVictoriasSorteosPérdidas
1Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2403
2Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun304
3Kleber Dynaxer HP4007
Pruebas incluidas en esta comparación