Ajustar la ponderación de la categoría
Ajuste la importancia de cada categoría de desempeño para ver cómo las diferentes prioridades afectan la clasificación general en todas las pruebas compartidas.
Seco 35% · Húmedo 50% · Comodidad 5% · Valor 10%
Ajustar las subcategorías
Seco
Húmedo
Comodidad
Valor
| Rango | Neumático | Puntaje | Seco | Húmedo | Comodidad | Valor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 97.2% | 100% | 98.4% | 98.9% | 80.7% |
| 2 | Firestone RoadHawk | 96.2% | 98.2% | 97.3% | 97% | 83.7% |
| 3 | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 | 96.1% | 98.3% | 94.2% | 100% | 95.8% |
| 4 | Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 95.4% | 97.4% | 96.9% | 97.6% | 79.4% |
Desglose de categorías
Desgloses detallados
Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Historial de victorias, empates y derrotas prueba por prueba
| Rango | Neumático | Victorias | Sorteos | Pérdidas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2 | Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 3 | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 4 | Firestone RoadHawk | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Pruebas incluidas en esta comparación
- 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview (2024, 205/55 R16)
- 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test (2024, 205/55 R16)