Menu

Vredestein Ultrac vs Kumho Ecsta HS52

2 neumáticos comparados 6 pruebas compartidas Verano
Vredestein Ultrac
Vredestein Ultrac
Verano · Rendimiento alto
Tyre Reviews8.5
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
0
Wins
1
Draw
5
Losses
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Verano · Turismo Premium
Tyre Reviews9.0
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
5
Wins
1
Draw
0
Losses

Ajustar la ponderación de la categoría

Ajuste la importancia de cada categoría de desempeño para ver cómo las diferentes prioridades afectan la clasificación general en todas las pruebas compartidas.

Seco 35%
Húmedo 50%
Comodidad 5%
Valor 10%
Seco 35% · Húmedo 50% · Comodidad 5% · Valor 10%
Ajustar las subcategorías
Seco
Húmedo
Comodidad
Valor
RangoNeumáticoPuntajeSecoHúmedoComodidadValor
1Kumho Ecsta HS5298.5%99.9%97.3%97.4%100%
2Vredestein Ultrac96.2%98.5%99.6%99.7%69.8%

Desglose de categorías

Desgloses detallados

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [s] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Dry Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Concrete [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [s] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Wet Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [s] (lower is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Subj. Comfort [Points] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Fuel Consumption [l/100km] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)
Historial de victorias, empates y derrotas prueba por prueba
RangoNeumáticoVictoriasSorteosPérdidas
1Kumho Ecsta HS52510
2Vredestein Ultrac015
Pruebas incluidas en esta comparación